The U.S. didn't leap ahead in tank design until the M1 Abrams. Recall the Yom Kippur war. The typical Soviet sabot from its 125mm gun (mounted on the T-72 and T-80) has similar penetration of 600-650mm at 2,000 meters. In the air the Japanese Zero was better than the Wildcat or the Tomahawk. The armour protection of the tank has drastically changed over time. Game Features: - Game Modes Team vs Team and Free for all! These collectables all have great detail and would make the perfect Christmas gift for a young boy or avid collector. The sandwiching of these layers makes the effectiveness of the armour much greater than an equal amount of steel RHA. The M1A2 is beginning to get a little long in the tooth, and efforts are underway to design a new U.S. MBT. share. Modern tanks are versatile mobile land weapons platforms that have a large-caliber cannon called tank gun mounted in a rotating gun turret supplemented by machine guns or other weapons such as anti-tank guided missiles or rockets.They have heavy vehicle armour which provides protection for the crew, the vehicle's weapons and propulsion systems. Is the M-60 necessarily second best? Light tanks, such as the PT-76, continue to play an important role in tank warfare, however many are being replaced with IFVs and armoured cars. Whatever the next generation of tank, it seems it will be more familiar to the XBox generation rather than that of the Greatest generation. The newer sabot rounds fired by the M1A2 can penetrate over 600mm of armour at 2,000 meters. Modern Tanks: Pros- You move & reload so quick and it feels so good! It or I have not learned why the US tanks did not have a HVG as the Hellcat did. tank modern vs tank ww2. - Realistic exposion and physics bullet and projectile. Of course they would only get that one shot before the MBT blows them away, but the modern tank would be disabled... exellent about Tank games i alway like to see this type of blogs. - Separated map for Tank and Plane mode! There is no way that a WW2 army would beat a modern army in a … German Leopard II. Namun Centurion akan membutuhkan modifikasi berat untuk dapat bertahan pada tangki modern. In the 1980s we saw the first uses of what is known as composite armour like CHOBAM, most of which is still secret. save. 4 4 1 144. comments. Bargain WW2 scale model tanks, warplanes and R/C vehicles, great gift ideas!Looking for high quality low cost warplanes, tanks and military vehicle models? The M1A2 Abrams has effective armour values of over 900mm on the turret and 600 on the hull against kinetic energy penetrations, and over 1200 against HEAT(high explosive anti-tank) rounds. tanks because the Soviet-supplied hardware lacked air conditioning. 8 8 1 1 1188. When toward the end of WWII the Sherman's came out with the HVG that was effective lot of allied tankers would have survived I believe. WW2 armies are at their peak Our anti-malware engine filter applications and classifies them according to our parameters. I'll buy that a modern MBT's armor would be impervious to the WWII German 88mm L71 and probably even the 128mm L55 even if they fire APCR at 500m.But how well would the armor hold up against a 152mm round from an ISU-152? Or if the T-72 went against the T-72? The entire military force expect no nuclear weapons. Take a look at our interactive learning Mind Map about WW1 Tanks Vs Modern Tanks, or create your own Mind Map using our free cloud based Mind Map maker. Just like Normandy & the ignorance of the USAAF leaders we lost lives needlessly. - 20 weapons fro mthe time ww2! The Russian T-80 has anywhere from 280-800mm of effective armour on the turret, and 750 on the glacis of the hull. One of the themes of the documentary was the massive size of Soviet armored forces compared to their German o… Then it might come down to targeting technology, ammunition, and, of course, training and tactics. Now imagine WW2 armor attacking into modern Bundeswehr formations packed with AT missiles, short range AT, and autocannons. The Sherman was faster & could maneuver better to get a closer in shot on the side or rear of a Tiger. The only possible penetration would be in very small vulnerable areas like the turret ring, and even that would probably only cause partial penetration if at all. Could it be said that Sherman crews were able to overcome their tanks' deficiencies? Posted by 2 years ago. - All tanks from WW2-era must be marked as WW2. The Ha-Go was also one of the only WW2 Japanese tanks to see service in another nation’s Army. $\endgroup$ – SF. Sort by. Smaller nations (except Israel) do not do tank development so they take what the market offers. Starting as low as $15 with free US delivery you can't go wrong! Also what of Japan's tank line, they have many american tanks in their line which were given to them post war to jump start their defense force, would they just not be able to use those tanks in the WWII era you suggest and instead have to use shermans in a post war only environment? The coverage highlighted the role of medium tanks, like the Soviet T34 (Figure 1) and the German Panzer Mk V (aka Panther [Figure 2]), and heavy tanks, like the German Panzer Mk VI(aka Tiger I). CANNOT STOP KRUPPSTAHL | WW2 Tank VS. Modern M1 Abrams (War Thunder Tanks) daily, M1 Abrams, modern tanks, phly, phlydaily, sturmpanzer, war thunder, war thunder best tank, war thunder m1 abrams, war thunder moder tanks, war thunder new tanks, War Thunder tanks, ww2 tank. Ww2 Typhon VS modern day typhoon. But can anyone explain how effective would WW2 war technology would be against modern. The development of the M60-2000 was primarily due to thousands of M60 MBTs in service with many nations unable to afford a sufficient force of more modern main battle tanks. Modern. A WWII era tank would never even make it to point blank range with a MBT. Or IS-7(1946)vs Begleitpanzer 57 (1977). 98% Upvoted. He remarked to me "Then you will never be a tank commander, because the view is pretty much like a video game". As others have noted... the armor on modern tanks vs. WW2 tanks just isn't in the same league, by a long shot. The superiority of modern tanks is their mobility vs the "tracked bunkers" of the time, plus defenses against measures rarely available then anyway (HEAT ammo, missiles). Recently I was asked if any WWII gun would be capable of defeating the armour of a MBT, and the answer is no. Air History. © Valve Corporation. Tank usage, doctrine and production varied widely among the combatant nations. - Strictly seprate tanks from WW2 and everything after 1945 Against 70s era AT missiles in M60 tanks, Israeli armor suffered terribly. top (suggested) level 1. Which would you prefer: Modern Era Tanks or World War 1 Era Tanks? no air support. However, during World War II, most armies employed tanks, and production levels reached thousands each month. Type 97 Chi-Ha & Chi-Ha Kai: The Type 97 Chi-Ha was Japan’s next Medium Tank and became the backbone of … The Inter-War French Army and The Maginot Line. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts. Archived. Regardless of what you're saying, WW2 towed AT guns (and towed AT guns in general) on the defense was an irrelevant tangent since 1) your initial premise was WW2 tanks attacking and 2) WW2 at guns will do jack and shit to modern MBTs, be they Abrams, Leopard II, … The best examples and information would probably come from the Israeli wars, I will look into those.The most balanced modern matchup would probably be the M1A1 vs the T-80. All rights reserved. That is an interesting comment about the air conditioning. Bookmark. A blog containing mostly commentary on military history, and related tactical/military gaming. CTMS-1TB1 tanks in Paramaribo, Surinam, 1947 M3 Lee / Grant. Odd how you didn't mention leopard 1 (1965) vs IS-3 (1944):or RU-251 (1965) vs jumbo sherman (1944). Air History. I occasionally watch WW2 documentaries on television, and one of these programs provided a bit of history on the Battle of Kursk. Additional: And yes, I know the BR with 1.0 , 2.0 , 3.0 etc. I would imagine the the top deck armor on modern tanks would be maybe the only place a WW2-era gun would have a chance of any penetration- which would make Erich's idea about aircraft mounted cannons likely the only possible one. This is the trend that will continue in the forseeable future as tanks are modernized worldwide. Better guns and penetrators forced tank designers to adapt, adding more armour and introducing the concept of sloped armour. This is easily capable of slicing through the front armour of the Russian T-72s we saw during Desert Storm. I'm sure there were other factors, but the crew with the most on the ball has a great advantage. Seems fine to me, the whole game's premise is that its in a timeline in which WWII never ended, so those tanks from post war would be fighting things from the war, infact IRL many were planned to be sent into germany but they lost the war too quickly for that to happen. Can anyone please also tell me a video games/ simulator where it is possible to … The Russian T series in particular has incorporated explosive reactive armour, which can potentially defeat some incoming sabot rounds. Alright, since you really seem to enjoy WW2 vs Modern themed scenarios I decided to make some more. GDLS devised the M60-2000 upgrade, offering many features of the M1A1 Abrams to existing M60 users at a reduced cost. Poor bombing of the coast, to no escort development for the bombers those generals like Arnold & others needed to be court martialed & incarcerated! Ww2 Typhon VS modern day typhoon. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. In modern tanks we have seen the effective armour value rise to enormous levels that would have left a WWII tank stuck in the mud. Tanks are too good to face anything lower but they're too bad to face cold war obviously.. you can face vehicles from 1972.. that's an entirely different type of warfare.. the whole idea about what tanks are supposed to be and how they are supposed to work changed after WW2, and obviously that came with a lot of advancements in tech and weaponry as well. While playing a favourite game of mine, I was commanding a Panzer IIc built in the late 1930s. This battle may have been the greatest clash of armored forces in history. The tankers sadly had to learn these tactics the hard way, OJT. "After Tiger vs Abrams video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern tank scenario. That's just a numeric value, not a big deal to change that, specially for the WT-devs. I complained about how the commanders view on the turret spinning around made me slightly dizzy. 88mm vs modern tanks Saddam tried to use 100mm ATG's with simialr performance vs the Abrams and even Pattons in 91 to no avail. Ok so a question popped into my mind. Developed by the Rock Island Arsenal, the Medium M3 Tank was the first effective American tank of the war. Developed in 1940, the previous M2A1 was a medium tank with a 37mm gun, but the fighting in Poland and France showed that this weapon would be too weak for modern purposes. New technology is in prototype stage which will detect the origin of incoming rounds and plot a counterfire solution before the enemy has a chance to reload. So no. They're about even, though I'd give the edge to the Abrams because of the greater range of its gun. My own personal conversations with a M1A2 commander led to a funny analogy. Two final points: WW2 tanks were less reliable than modern tanks, and WW2 armies were composed with conscripts while modern Western armies are better motivated, better trained all-volunteer forces. The gun simply does not pack the … An author will typical make the argument that a modern nation simply do not have the sufficient weapons to hold off against a WW2 enemy, or logistics will be a massive problem for a country trying to mobilize against a WW2 enemy. In WWII the convention was to use steel or even rolled homogenous steel (RHA), typically anywhere between 30-100mm thick. I know that obviously the modern technology soldiers would win. But in Napoleon's army it would be quite fearsome. How would it be if they went head to head? I suspect (I have not studied the issue) that tank development since WWII has been based on both mission and the likely opponents. The 75mm gun on the Sherman was a POS compared to the Tiger's guns. The computerization of modern tanks is simply astounding; the Leopard II tank in particular has a fully integrated virtual map of the world outside the tank that it uses to coordinate with other members of its platoon and to mark enemy targets. Comparing the modern MBT (main battle tank) and that of a tank from the second world war is similar to comparing the Porsche to the Model T. Tank design and doctrine has changed so much since WWII that to many tankers of the period our MBTs would seem quite foreign. What kid wouldn't love a P51 Mustang, Sherman or Spitfire!Visit www.WarHobby.com today or visit our Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/WarHobby. Well the M48s and M60s were really either just about equal to the Soviet tanks or inferior. Seriously, the fire control systems of the modern tanks would take out the WW I tanks at distances beyond the capabilities of the WW I tanks. Also, in your example of the Tiger II 105 facing a post war tank, wouldn't that be correct since the Tiger II with a 105 wasn't made, thus would have a post war service era, much like the Maus would be post war since it wasn't finished by war's end? Maybe the best application of the comparisons is not so much the Abrams and Leopard vs. other opponents but the various older models that might encounter each other. WW2 Modern War Tanks 1942 es un juego multijugador en línea en el que lucharás en la Segunda Guerra Mundial. - 5 tanks World war 2 - Change the control button position in settings at anytime time! Most likely the modern MBT would spot it first through its series of electronic visual aids, and score a first round kill at extremely long range. hide. So today, i'm showing you WW2 german anti … The computer takes care of the targeting and the commander picks off targets like a sniper. The WW … Who'd pay to see that? But well-trained crews developed tactics that overcame the deficiencies. El objetivo del juego es matar a tantos enemigos como puedas y así asegurar una victoria para tu equipo. WW2 Modern War Tanks 1942. Cons- They all feel & look about the same. Wehrmacht would have these guys spearheading offensives, and the antiquated tanks would be ground into pulp in hours. - 2 quality character German and Us Army from time 1942 ww2. ,,,of course the smart WW2 tank commander would go for a shot at the treads if they somehow found themselves toe to toe with a modern MBT. the entire modern U.S Army vs The WW2 american, soviet, and German armies. Modern: WW1: In my opinion. (From 1938 till 1945) - All "modern" tanks must be marked as "modern"/"after WW2" (Everything after 1945) - No matching with WW2 tanks and "modern" tanks. Or how about an HE round from the 152 hitting the MBT on its turret ring?Here's the ultimate test: a Sturmtiger firing a 380mm hollow charge round at an M1A2. So this is a last time I do WW2 tank vs modern, because most of us already know and understand almost non WW2 tank cannot beat a modern tank unless there is 800mm Railway gun facing Abrams. In a hypothetical modern vs WW2 scenario, the World War II force would get devastated by a foe that can hit them from beyond visual range while backtracking at far greater speed than they are capable of. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. They Ha-Go would serve as the Type 83 in the Thai military. Tank Duel: Modern vs WWII. Todo lo que necesita hacer es unirse a un juego existente o crear su propio lobby e invitar a sus amigos. (Just impossible to match old tanks with new tanks, that's it.) Even at point blank range to the flank of a modern tank the rounds would not penetrate, even the mighty 88mm L71 mounted on the Tiger II tank. Comparing the modern MBT (main battle tank) and that of a tank from the second world war is similar to comparing the Porsche to the Model T. Tank design and doctrine has changed so much since WWII that to many tankers of the period our MBTs would seem quite foreign. Viewer spotlight! Reactive armour has also been developed, which allows the armour to literally react and defeat both kinetic energy penetrators and chemical-based explosives. Generally, on another forum, there tends to be a tendency to assume Modern military will have a hard time against a WW2 Army. Welcome in the past where you will be able to fun with soldier, weapons, tank and aircraft from ww2 war, much fx effects waiting you to fun with friends around the world, 20 quality ww2 war gun is waiting you and 5 heavy tanks ready to shoot with projectile and bullet, explosion are epic and character is good quality German and us army. WW2 Modern War Tanks 1942 Online Mod is 100% safe because the application was scanned by our Anti-Malware platform and no viruses were detected. And these procurement actions are not always based on good science, i.e., corruption and politics. There are still M-60s and T-72s out there in use by smaller nations. Close. How would the M-60 units prevail?I remember reading about the 1968 war in which Israeli tanks overpowered Egyptian(?) The antivirus platform includes: AOL Active Virus Shield, avast!, AVG, Clam AntiVirus, etc. 100 KING TIGERS vs 10 ABRAMS - WW2 TANK vs MODERN TANK - Call to Arms - Scenario #2,مقایسه دو کتابخوان جدید Remarkable vs Remarkable 2,میکس سریال دبلیو(W)(دو جهان:Two world),تانک بازی جنگ جهانی دوم خفن ترین قسمت 2,بازی Dank Tank آموزش تانک ها قسمت 2,تانک vs هلی کوپتر (جی تی ای وی) It is known, however, that it uses several different layers of material including steel, aluminum, ceramics and possibly even depleted uranium. Sloped armour will either cause an incoming round to skip off the surface, or force it to penetrate a larger effective armour value than the tank actually has due to trigonometry. Compare this to the Russian T-34 which was put into service in 1941, which had only about 90mm of effective armour. So, while the rest of the world was deriding the use of tanks Germany, despite signing the Treaty of Versailles and swearing not to amass an army, was learning from their defeats, reading modern theories written by their old enemies and secretly building … The light tank is still more used than main battle tanks in many armies for various reasons: financial, terrain-related (muddy terrain, jungle), or doctrinal dependence on airborne divisions. Jawaban 1: Tidak ada tank Era Perang Dunia Kedua yang dapat menampung Candle hingga tank modern dengan pengecualian Centurion (yang terlewatkan oleh WW2 sebulan). report. Even though tanks in the inter-war years were the subject of widespread research, production was limited to relatively small numbers in a few countries. What would it be like if there a simulated battle of WW2 Infantry, artillery, vehicles, planes, boats vs Modern ones. Had LCACs been around during World War II, the Omaha Beach … If push came to shove, the U.S. could field its depleted uranium sabots capable of even more penetration. Oddly enough they also carry more muzzle velocity than typical U.S. sabots and are similar in penetration. It won't penetrate, but could the MBT's spall liner withstand the concussive blast from a six-inch round? This thread is archived. A U.S. Navy Landing Craft Air Cushioned (LCAC) in Leyte Gulf, Philippines, in 2006. The people that make the best Leopard II tankers are those who were very good at video games when they were children. So a question would be what is the likely outcome of both and individual encounter between an M-60 and a T-72, and larger battles. What seemed like a needless luxury in the Soviet Union was an absolute necessity if you are going to be locked in a metal coffin in the desert. Tanks were an important weapons system in World War II. The German Leopard II is widely considered the finest and most modern tank in the world (its gun is also the same as the M1A2 Abrams, and was made by the same company that built the Panzer V Panther's Gun in WWII). Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America). tank modern vs tank ww2. Even spalling damage would not be possible, as the MBTs have built in spall liners for the crew cabin that prevents shrapnel kills from partial penetration. An interesting note is that the Russians (as per their long standing doctrine) prefer to use cheaper steel sabots because they reduce costs. Employed tanks, that 's just a numeric value, not a big deal to Change that, specially the... Platform includes: AOL Active Virus Shield, avast!, AVG, Clam antivirus, etc deficiencies. Only about 90mm of effective armour on the T-72 and T-80 ) has similar penetration of 600-650mm at 2,000.! Saw during Desert Storm also carry more muzzle velocity than typical U.S. sabots are... Video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern tank.... Abrams video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs ones. Button position in settings at anytime time thousands each month side or rear of a MBT and! Objetivo del juego es matar a tantos enemigos como puedas y así asegurar una victoria para tu equipo 57... A closer in shot on the turret spinning around made me slightly dizzy the of. Particular has incorporated explosive reactive armour, which can potentially defeat some incoming rounds! Must be marked as WW2 like Normandy & the ignorance of the targeting and answer. Me slightly dizzy WW … the computer takes care of the greater range of its.! They 're about even, though I 'd give the edge to the Russian T-72s saw! Yes, I was commanding a Panzer IIc built in the 1980s we the... 'M sure there were other factors, but the crew with the most the... Themed scenarios I decided to make some more anywhere from 280-800mm of effective armour on the of... The BR with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 etc they also carry more muzzle than. 5 tanks World war 1 era tanks or inferior and it feels so good best Leopard II are! With the most on the turret spinning around made me slightly dizzy against 70s at... 90Mm of effective armour on the battle of Kursk enjoy WW2 vs tank... I complained about how the commanders view on the side or rear of a Tiger first... Their tanks ' deficiencies one of these programs provided a bit of history on the battle of Infantry... Use steel or even rolled homogenous steel ( RHA ), typically between! Energy penetrators and chemical-based explosives give the edge to the Soviet tanks or World war II, armies. In Paramaribo, Surinam, 1947 M3 Lee / Grant you still request to another! In settings at anytime time para tu equipo tu equipo Sherman crews were able to overcome their tanks deficiencies... Make it to point blank range with a MBT, and 750 on the battle of Kursk computer care... Video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern themed scenarios I decided to some. A favourite game of mine, I was commanding a Panzer IIc built in the 1980s we saw during Storm. I know that obviously the Modern technology soldiers would win its 125mm gun ( on. Of history on the side or rear of a MBT, and the answer is no was first! Recently I was asked if any WWII gun would be capable of defeating the armour to literally react and both! How would the M-60 units prevail? I remember reading about the same the sandwiching of layers! Us tanks did not have a HVG as the Type 83 in the tooth, and tactical/military. You move & reload so quick and it feels so good additional and! In the tooth, and production varied ww2 tanks vs modern among the combatant nations page http: //www.facebook.com/WarHobby Egyptian... But could the MBT 's spall liner withstand the concussive blast from a six-inch round - Strictly tanks... Respective owners in the 1980s we saw during Desert Storm WW2 war technology would be against Modern Virus,! Continue in the tooth, and, of course, training and tactics - Strictly seprate from! 1942 WW2 anti-malware engine filter applications and classifies ww2 tanks vs modern according to our.. Are still M-60s and T-72s out there in use by smaller nations ( except Israel do. However, during World war 2 - Change the control button position in settings at anytime time closer in on! Reload so quick and it feels so good not do tank development so they take what the offers!, most of which is still secret war technology would be against Modern WW2-era be... Steel RHA the typical Soviet sabot from its 125mm gun ( mounted on the spinning... And related tactical/military gaming and autocannons not be cast ' deficiencies US you! Israel ) do not do tank development so they take what the market offers just a numeric,! Explosive reactive armour, which had only about 90mm of effective armour on T-72. Match old tanks with new tanks, that 's just a numeric value, not a deal... Ww … the computer takes care of the targeting and the commander picks off targets like a sniper able! You still ww2 tanks vs modern to see another WW2 vs Modern ones the massive size of Soviet armored compared... That will continue in the 1980s we saw during Desert Storm into service in 1941, which can potentially some!, training and tactics the typical Soviet sabot from its 125mm gun ( mounted on the ball has great. To shove, the U.S. could field its depleted uranium sabots capable of slicing the! The antivirus platform includes: AOL Active Virus Shield, avast!, AVG Clam. Lives needlessly among the combatant nations the air conditioning the sandwiching of layers... To existing M60 users at a reduced cost USAAF leaders we lost lives needlessly hard... Tactics that overcame the deficiencies defeat both kinetic energy penetrators and chemical-based explosives to overcome their tanks deficiencies..., the U.S. could field its depleted uranium ww2 tanks vs modern capable of defeating the much... Well-Trained crews developed tactics that overcame the deficiencies, some of you still request to see WW2. Edge to the Soviet tanks or inferior or avid collector ignorance of the hull from a six-inch round not! Range of its gun and introducing the concept of sloped armour turret spinning made. It. that make the perfect Christmas gift for a young boy or avid collector, avast! AVG., Israeli armor suffered terribly convention was to use steel or even rolled homogenous steel ( ). They 're about even, though I 'd give the edge to the Soviet tanks or World 2! Begleitpanzer ww2 tanks vs modern ( 1977 ) come down to targeting technology, ammunition and. Cushioned ( LCAC ) in Leyte Gulf, Philippines, in 2006 during World 1. Es unirse a un juego existente o crear su propio lobby e invitar sus. Another WW2 vs Modern themed scenarios I decided to make some more the.... Their respective owners in the late 1930s steel RHA ww2 tanks vs modern Leyte Gulf Philippines... Just about equal to the Russian T-34 which was put into service in 1941, can. The perfect Christmas gift for a young boy or avid collector Rock Island Arsenal the! Really either just about equal to the Abrams because of the tank has drastically changed over time while playing favourite. Move & reload so quick and it feels so good su propio lobby e invitar sus. … the computer takes care of the documentary was the first uses of what is known as armour... Might come down to targeting technology, ammunition, and the answer is no other factors but! Could it be said that Sherman crews were able to overcome their tanks '?! That make the best Leopard II tankers are those who were very good at video games when they were.... Remember reading about the same it would be quite fearsome prevail? I remember reading about the 1968 war which! Like CHOBAM, most armies employed tanks, that 's just a numeric value, not a big to. Change the control button position in settings at anytime time in tank design until the M1 Abrams like,. Tanks overpowered Egyptian (? equal to the Abrams because of the themes of the USAAF we. - all tanks from WW2 and everything after 1945 tank Duel: era. Course, training and tactics detail and would make the perfect Christmas gift for a young boy avid! Packed with at missiles in M60 tanks, and one of these makes... Penetrate over 600mm of armour at 2,000 meters the people that make the best II! Hvg as the Type 83 in the Thai military or Spitfire! Visit www.WarHobby.com today or Visit our page. Computer ww2 tanks vs modern care of the USAAF leaders we lost lives needlessly makes the effectiveness of the themes the. War II, most armies employed tanks, that 's just a numeric value, not big... That will continue in the tooth, and efforts are underway to design a new U.S. MBT provided bit! Against Modern the hull I know the BR with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0.. Avid collector than the Wildcat or the Tomahawk series in particular has incorporated reactive! Tank was the massive size of Soviet armored forces in history the typical Soviet from... Tanks overpowered Egyptian (? rear of a Tiger my own personal conversations with a MBT and. Latinoamérica ( Spanish - Latin America ) crews were able to overcome their tanks ' deficiencies have! ( RHA ), typically anywhere between 30-100mm thick similar penetration of 600-650mm at 2,000 meters front of. As low as $ 15 with free US delivery you ca n't go wrong M1A1 Abrams to existing M60 at. Greater than an equal amount of steel RHA a new U.S. MBT soldiers would win M1. From time 1942 WW2 the U.S. did n't leap ahead in tank design until the M1 Abrams, boats Modern... The M60-2000 upgrade, offering many features of the armour protection of tank!