Such marriages would destroy worship and undermine the entire covenant. Did they not learn from their history and their exile? Sorry to detract from the thread, but unless I am misreading what you wrote or intended to convey, it seems odd to say that an omniscient God might not understand something, including a person’s intentions. The Search Of The Wise Men (Matthew 2:1-12), Christmas Searches: Expository Sermons For Christmas, 3. Based on what I bolded above, would this make my earlier post accurate? What we have in the book is a number of his messages; we have them because they are part of the divine revelation of God and timeless in their relevance. Hence, both parties need to … After all, Peter reminded all Christian men to treat their wives with respect as joint heirs of the covenant “so that nothing will hinder [their] prayers” (1 Pet. Relevance. A divorce, according to his word, is the breaking of a covenant, a falling short of the standard of God, and a serious and painful complication of life that seems never to go away. I don’t know the specific rules, but it is my understanding that in such a circumstance, if you both pledge to God to be man and wife, then it is a valid marriage. The idea would be that some Israelites were bringing pagan idolaters into the Lord’s house and therefore profaning it. Their personal blessing depended on preserving this covenant; and the well-being of the nation depended on the marriages doing what they were supposed to do. She was not only the wife of his youth, but his comrade, his partner. In fact, the first sign that his hands performed was at a bridal festival where he turned the water into wine for the joyous celebrations to continue. John W. Lv 6. It is a life term commitment before God to stay together. Read this useful list of other common rhetorical devices and boost your rhetoric! Both violate the covenant and bring pain to God, but the latter causes great pain to the women who were put away. She has been featured in hundreds of media venues, including The New York Times, The 700 Club, Power Women, Daystar Television, and others. bulltaker. Marrying an idolatrous woman was one thing; but dumping a legitimate wife for her is another. It cannot be ignored, because it stands there as a witness. Marriage is not a piece of paper, wedding, or ring. It heightened, it perfected, the pure, fresh, and serene joys of that Garden, the scene of every beauty and the temple of God; and so it has been perpetuated to this present hour as asocial blessing to soothe and sustain us amidst the depressing and difficulty circumstances of our fallen condition. For official apologetics resources please visit. Introduction Marriage is an institution of God. And we find no better description of this violation and its pain than in the Bible than in Malachi 2. His message follows two major sins, first the divorces, and then the marriages to foreign women. Perhaps with the reference to the “tents” we can get the idea of watchmen at either end of the camp, one calling out and the other answering. A rhetorical analysis of the essay can provide an effective understanding of Brady’s mind in narration. The general statement is given first: “the man who does this.” Then the specifics: “him that wakes and him that answers.” There are many suggested interpretations for this difficult phrase. But a curse from the prophet was warning enough that if such sin was persisted in it would bring the penalty. To motivate diligence and care for the marriage, Malachi has included three warnings: 1) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) destroys worship; 2) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) hinders producing godly children; and 3) God hates divorce. 32:18; Isa. Their woe rose to God with such intensity that God no longer could regard (give attention to) the offerings brought by the men. Pagan intermarriage and the dissolution of good marriages would ruin the chance to do this. When they divorced and married women who worshiped false gods, Malachi presented their actions as a defilement of the holiness of the LORD. Xper 1. It would destroy Israelite worship, and therefore the covenant. Gay marriage will not renew marriage’s central public role because committed, loving gays and lesbians intend to abide by the same principles on which the institution of marriage … God wanted a nation; he could have chosen and formed others, or more. RHETORICAL QUESTION AND THEIR ANSWERS IN ROMANS RHETORICAL QUESTION: “What shall we say then? This was very harsh language; the sin must have had greater implications than, say, a couple not getting along and divorcing. For people to sin, say, for them to get rid of their spouses in order to marry pagans, biblical Law would have to be challenged, qualified, or set aside in some way. . It is clear that the intermarriage of Israelites with pagans was repugnant to God; and it should have then been a matter of reverential dread to the people as well. If they knew of the sacrament of marriage before they were “deserted”, again it is quite an irrational scenario…but I’ll play along and say “no”. The last expression is set off by itself in the poetry: “him that offers a offering (a gift, minkhah) to Yahweh of armies.” The point is that judgment would fall on such covenant violators, even if they appeared to be faithful and generous worshipers of God (albeit hypocritically). In the modern world the dissolution of a marriage is rarely considered a sin; rather, it is an option that may be taken to avoid difficulties or tensions. Malachi’s style is first to give the theological principle (against which there was no argument), then the general rebuke (over which people would be concerned), and then the actual sin (which would hit home). Ultimately, it is about your happiness. Job’s friends are described as treacherous as a brook. 4 d. NO under no circumstances, what if they didn't like sex? The brook provided water, as the text explains, so that people became dependent on it. twinkie =) 1 decade ago. The word rhetorical is derived from the Latin word rhetoricus and the Greek word rhetorikos whic… It is a way of adding style to your essay.. And secondly, because a rhetorical question is also a device used or proffered as proof of the negative. Their tears were what God saw, not the offerings of their husbands. --to produce a godly seed in the earth. Malachi delivered his burden to the people of Israel well after the time of the return and revivals of Ezra and Nehemiah, somewhere between 440 and 400 B.C. Aporia comes in many forms but the most celebrated example is a quote from Shakespeare that almost everyone who went to school as quoted at least once. These heightened the boldness of the sin--it was no marginal problem of people who had no biblical training; it was in the very center of the political and religious community. 78:68; 87:2) and prohibits idolatry from the sanctuary. 3 Answers. Still, child marriage is much more common in the developing world because one of the main driving factors is poverty. The term is bagad (bah-gad), related to beged (“garment”). In the Jewish writings the verb came to mean “act violently, faithlessly, and rebel.” So the people had been unfaithful to God, traitors to the covenant. Where else in the essay does she use a rhetorical question? 3:7). He mentioned Israel, Judah, and Jerusalem in order. the rhetorical question should be about if we are born with our identity or not. Their replacing the garment of marriage, their vows of love and devotion to their wives, with acts of social abuse and emotional and even physical violence, God hated as well. But the principle as it will be related to marriage is well summarized by Hengstenberg: The one who annulled the distinction between an Israelite and a heathen woman proved by this very action that he had already annihilated the distinction between the God of Israel and the idols of the heathen, that he no longer had the theocratic consciousness of God (Christologie, III:381). Hence, it is a very difficult situation to explore. Malachi’s message was similar to that of Ezra and Nehemiah; but he alone focused on the pain all this caused and on the fact that God hates it. These questions are perfect for a road trip. A rhetorical question is asked merely for effect with no answer expected: "Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who would want to live in an institution?" These rhetorical questions aren't arguments; they're just inflammatory remarks which make the hidden assumption that heterosexual couples are worthy of marrying but homosexual couples are not. Who stood to be so “cut off” by God? After the captivity many folks got carried away with their freedom. It could refer to the temple. The words “defile, profane” and “holiness” are cleverly put together--they are antonyms. there's the old rhetorical question : "Would you buy a car without test driving it first? The difficulty of this view is that monogamy does not guarantee godly children would be produced. She makes her audience think of the need for marriage. Thus, it seems to lack prudence to make that presumption. Sex without that is sin. What Malachi is doing is offering the quintessential reason for trying to keep a marriage together come what may--God hates divorce. 1:2; and Jer. Rhetorical questions are a great way to achieve that. It was an integral ingredient in the happiness of Eden, and so is an integral part of society. How effective is Brady's final rhetorical question? The final section is clearly set off as a warning for those who are in a marriage. These are just two examples of 'rhetorical devices' and there are plenty more where they came from. Unfortunately, things have not turned out very well. That is what their hand produced, as Malachi put it. Argument Analysis on Gay Marriage There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. Jennifer Maggio is a national author and speaker who is also a wife, mother, and founder of The Life of a Single Mom Ministries. Liturgy and Sacraments. The apostles caught the idea of their master, and invested it with mystic solemnity by presenting it as a type of the substantial, invisible and everlasting union existing between Christ and his bride, the church. It is a powerful literary device which when used effectively can add immense value to your writing. But this is what we are seeing today, people entering all kinds of religious service with new marriages, never having admitted, let alone confessed, that there has been sin. Alerts caregiver when patient stop using the Fall Alert app. An example is... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples Whatever was there that fit the description of “holy matrimony” had now become nothing more than a “common coupling” or “profane fornication.”. The reason that God loathed it was that it “defiled the holiness” of God that he loves. Malachi says to take heed that this is preserved--do everything in your power to do it. But in this modern day and age, no one is pressured into an arranged marriage. - i swear someone just asked that question on yahoo a … The highest rates of child marriage are seen in West and Central Africa, where over four in ten girls were married before age 18. In marriages there will be fallings from the ideal for sure; the marriage may be strained and thinned by friction, or marred and spoiled by a gross contempt for its moral meaning; but the failures and abuse do not destroy or degrade the ideal. Such dedication is a delusion. To God, however, divorce is a sin, no matter what the causes or circumstances, or who is the guilty party or who is the innocent party. Rather, each passage comes from a particular set of circumstances or a particular question. This second sin grew out of the first, for in finding and marrying pagan women they put away their primary wives by divorce. The verb “take heed” means “to watch carefully.” It calls for constant vigilance and concern, like a night watchman watching the city. Brady uses pathos in her stylish language. Thus, yes, the sin of fornication would indeed be present if they engaged in sexual relations. She was not a servant or a slave; she was a partner. A rhetorical question is one for which the questioner does not expect a direct answer: in many cases it may be intended to start a discourse, or as a means of displaying the speaker's or author's opinion on a topic.. A common example is the question "Can't you do anything right?" But the prophets wanted everyone to realize that the failure was a sin, and that to go ahead in life with God they first had to acknowledge that, or as we say, own it, at least own their part in something that fell short of the will of God. To do this, then, was to dishonor God and act faithlessly against fellow members of the covenant. - i swear someone just asked that question on yahoo a … RHETORICAL QUESTION AND THEIR ANSWERS IN ROMANS RHETORICAL QUESTION: “What shall we say then? Malachi’s reference to their creator as “father” recalls the language of Malachi 1:6, “Is not God our father?” And the use of “father” recalls the covenant relationship that God established in Egypt and confirmed by covenant at Sinai (“let my son go”; see Exod. Writers love to prompt further thinking and reflection. Favorite Answer "who are you?" The scenario offered is that there are no witnesses, hence my opinion that there can be no valid marriage. So I was wondering about something. So I was wondering, suppose that there is a man and a woman cut off from civilization, on a desert island if you will, who have no means of obtaining a proper sacramental marriage, but would if they could. need a rhetorical question supporting gay marriage, please help Malachi begins by laying down a principle: although Israel was created by one Father, they were guilty of treachery against the covenant. Pride and Prejudice is famous for its use of irony.In irony, the intended or literal meaning of words is different from their actual meaning. Now a second thing that they did is mentioned by the prophet. Rhetorical Questions in Literature. We are always called back to the ideal, to the standard of God. Now she had become the scorn and loathing of his later years. The wives who had been put away were in great mourning and anguish. The overall forgiveness process is the same: cleaning, healing, scar removal. The fact that God was witness tells us that marriage is a covenant, whether there was a ceremony or not. or "what makes you you?" You did misread, but it could have been my wording. 7 years ago. No marriage is perfect. The word has a use in Job that illustrates the meaning. Some may find that it is too late, because they have lived through a failed marriage and there is no going back. These questions are rarely answered in discussions of “marriage equality.” If revisionists think marriage should be redefined, they must develop an alternative definition for it. Thus, it would mean everyone, from one end of the settlement to the other. 1 0. Child marriage is known to take place across a wide range of communities, ethnicities and religions. And since the message begins with the affirmation of the sovereignty of God, then the message is that unfaithfulness to the marriage in this way is disloyalty to God. It would be normal to think of Genesis 2 because Adam and Eve were to be “one flesh.” God could have done it differently--he had the residue of the Spirit, that is, he had all the resources and options available. Examples and Observations "Something [rhetorical] questions all have in common .